Κυριακή 4 Φεβρουαρίου 2018

What is the Monitoring, Reporting and Verification (MRV regulation)?

New rules affecting shipping often come into effect at the turn of the year and from 1 January 2018 the major change for ships above 5,000gt will be the requirement to comply with the EU’s Monitoring, Reporting and Verification (MRV regulation).

The MRV regulation is the regulator’s response to the accusation that shipping is not doing enough to reduce its CO2 emissions. Quite clearly putting a lower limit of 5,000gt on the regulation will exclude huge numbers of ships, but those that are covered are considered to be responsible for around 90% of CO2 emissions from ships.

Under MRV regulation rules, ships will be required to monitor the CO2 emissions from ships, make an annual report of those emissions to an approved third party verifier and for the verified reports to be submitted to appropriate authorities where they will be aggregated. The information gathered will then be used to determine future efficiency regulation and also very likely to be used as grounds for including shipping into some market-based measure that will raise money to supposedly offset the effect of those emissions.

There are two MRV regulation regimes that will be operating. The first of these to come into effect is an EU regime with the IMO’s own similar but not identical regulation coming into effect later in 2018. The EU regime applies only to ships planning to make calls to ports in the EEA – effectively any EU member state plus Iceland and Norway. The governing rules are laid out in Regulation (EU) 2015/757 which is supplemented by Regulation (EU) 2016/2072 (accreditation and appointment of verifiers) and Regulation (EU) 2016/1927 (requirement for monitoring plans).

It is important to read all of the regulations together because shipowners need to follow designated pathways to making reports and must have a documented plan in place that will need to be followed. The January 2018 date is in fact the second of two deadlines in the EU regulation as the requirement for an approved plan for the company to be in place was back in August 2017.

EU and EEA shipowners will have been made aware of the requirements by flag states but for ships registered in other countries the owners may have been unaware of the exact requirements especially the fact that the verifier must have been approved by one of the member states of the EEA. The fact that one of the deadlines has already passed is not a huge obstacle as under Article 6.2 of the EU rules, the owner will have two months from the date of any affected ships first port call to put all requirements in place. For any owner still lagging in implementing the requirements, the 2016/1927 Regulations which can be downloaded from a number of sources includes a very useful plan template.

MRV regulation – Gathering facts


Although there may be some grace period for ships which do not yet have a reporting plan in place, it will be important that they at least understand the requirements so that appropriate records and documentation can be kept. For each ship this will include fuel consumption and other parameters, such as distance, time at sea and quantity of cargo carried. The quantity of cargo carried is included because the EU ETS (Emission Trading System) that the owners may have to participate in is about the amount of work done by cargo and distance which is in contrast to the IMO’s simpler variant which just records distance.

The monitoring plan is required to describe the vessel and its installed combustion machinery, and provide information in a complete and transparent manner. What kind of fuel will be used and which of the provided methods for the determination of fuel oil consumption for monitoring and reporting CO2 emissions or other relevant information is chosen.

There are four available methods for determining consumption; Bunker fuel delivery note (BDN) and periodic stocktakes of fuel tanks, Bunker fuel tank monitoring on board, Flow meters for applicable combustion processes and finally Direct CO2 emission measurements using calibrated equipment. It is permissible to use a combination to improve accuracy. Shipowners need to consider how to measure emissions which may involve purchasing and installing emission monitoring systems some of which can simultaneously measure and record other exhaust emissions such as NOx and SOx.

MRV regulation – Getting help


It will be some relief to shipowners to know that assisting them in complying with the EU rules has been prioritised by several organisations especially classification societies, software and hardware producers and more beside. Almost without exception, the class societies that are part of IACS have been approved as verifiers and many of these have also developed their own plan templates that owners can use to build their own specific plans. Software that records voyage data can be useful as can the products offered by engine management and control systems manufacturers.

IMO rules differ

Unlike the EU, which has made no secret of the fact that the collection of data is intended to bring shipping into an ETS, the IMO’s rules to gather information on CO2 emissions are at present merely an attempt to quantify exact figures. What may evolve thereafter will eb a matter for national delegations to the IMO to decide and that looks to eb a very contentious debate.

The rules governing IMO data also cover only ships above 5,000gt and they are to be found in chapter 4 of MARPOL Annex VI under Regulation 22A. In addition, new appendices have been developed outlining ‘Information to be submitted to the IMO, including ‘Ship Fuel oil Consumption Database’ (Appendix IX), and ‘Form of Statement of Compliance – Fuel Oil Consumption Reporting’ (Appendix X). These rules come into effect from March 2018 and the first reporting period will be for the full year 2019.

The data that is collected under the IMO regime is reported to flag states which will aggregate it and submit the data for the f lag to the IMO for inclusion into an IMO database. The data to be submitted includes the fuel consumption data (by fuel type and in metric tonnes), as well as distance travelled and time at sea, from berth to berth.

There are other consequences of the IMO rules that will affect all shipowners including those subject to the EU regulations. All shipowners will have to ensure that by 31 December 2018, the Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) onboard each of their vessels has been amended to include the methodologies that will be used for collecting the required data and reporting that data to the flag state.

The table below sets out the core components of the two systems alongside each other for ease of comparison.


Future Developments

The EU intends to use the data gathered as a basis for including shipping in its ETS from 2023/24 if by 2023 the IMO has not established a means for immediate reduction in CO2 emissions from the industry.
At MEPC 72 in April 2018, the issue will be high on the agenda but while there is an acceptance of the need for shipping to become more efficient the method of doing this remains the subject of fierce debate.
The IMO has included the issue as one of its strategic developments adopted at the IMO Assembly in December 2017 and Shipping industry bodies have also submitted proposals. The IMO is planning the adoption of a revised strategy in 2023 to include short-, mid-, and long-term further measures, as required, including implementation schedules. However, there is no evident consensus on the ways to proceed as things stand.


Full details may be read at,

https://shipinsight.com/mrv-regulation/

 

Πέμπτη 18 Ιανουαρίου 2018

Requirements of MARPOL ANNEX V as amended by MEPC.277(70)

At the seventy session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 70) held on October 2016, amendments to MARPOL V was adopted and amended MARPOL V adopted by MEPC.277(70) will enter into force on 1 March 2018. Please also refer to ClassNK Technical Information No.TEC-1103 issued on 10 March 2017.

And, also, implementation guideline of MARPOL V was amended by MEPC.295(71).

By the amendment, handling procedure, management method, and record keeping method regarding garbage from ships were changed. Therefore, vessels are required to implement the followings by 1 March 2018:

1. Solid bulk cargoes other than grain shall be classified in accordance with appendix I of MEPC.277(70), and declared by the shipper as to whether or not they are harmful to the marine environment.

2. Amended form (including amendment of garbage category for the purpose of recording) of Garbage Record Book has to be kept onboard and entries shall be made in the amended form. Please refer to appendix II of MEPC.277(70).

3. Garbage is to be handled taking into account amended garbage category.

Similar to before, no statutory certificate or mandatory inspection is regulated under the MARPOL V.

So far, Class NK has done many appraisal services related to MARPOL V under voluntary basis as requested by ship owners (refer to Class NK Technical Information No.TEC-1076). Now, we will continue this service according to the revised MARPOL V.

In case you require statement of fact according to the amended MARPOL V or examination of Garbage Management plan (including Garbage Management plan examined in accordance with existing MARPOL V), please contact the convenient Class NK survey site with the following necessary documents.

Required documents for the survey,

1)      Application 1 set

2)      Documents for the ship (Placards, Garbage Management plan and Garbage Record book) 2 sets each

3)      Documents for reference (Specification of (e.g. equipment for the handling of garbage)) 1 set

Both examination of Garbage Management Plan and onboard inspection are required to issue the appraisal certificate. (Only examination of Garbage Management Plan can be done without onboard inspection, but in this case appraisal certificate will not be issued)
 
Related IMO Circular may be downloaded at,

UK Club: Cargo delivery without original BOLs raises concerns

Delivery of cargo without presentation of an original bill of lading, although non-recommended, is a reality of international trade, UK P&I Club notes. Delays in the documentary chain, and onward sales of the cargo while it is in transit, often means that original bills are not available when the ship reaches the discharge port.

It is common in a lot of trades, whether bulk or oil, to accept a Letter of Indemnity (LOI) for non-production of bills of lading. Although it is commonly accepted in many trades, the consequences of non-performance can be extremely serious. According to the Club, there are four main risks associated with delivery of cargo without presentation of original bills of lading:

·         Mis-delivery of cargo,

·         Insurance cover: liabilities arising as a consequence of mis-delivery are not covered under all P&I Club rules unless the Directors of the club in question otherwise agree,

·         It is not certain whether the LOI will in fact respond in the event of a mis-delivery claim,

·         Concerns  about the creditworthiness of the party providing the LOI.

The Club notes the following key issues:

1.     P&I cover is prejudiced if cargo is delivered against an LOI and claims arise where the cargo is mis-delivered.

2.     It is absolutely essential that operators get the wording of the LOI right and ensure that proper procedures are in place to demonstrate compliance with the LOI

3.     Operators must also actively weigh up the counter party risk of accepting an LOI. An LOI is only as secure as the party providing it.

As it is understood, it is very important for owners to be very meticulous regarding their procedures of delivering cargo. It is absolutely essential that Members get the wording of the LOI right and ensure that proper procedures are in place to demonstrate compliance with the LOI. 

To see the full report please click links below,
Or
 

Swedish Club launches guide on cargo fires

When a fire breaks out on board a vessel there is no fire service ready to assist in extinguishing it – it is up to the crew themselves. The Swedish P&I Club issued a new guide for quick reference to the causes and prevention of cargo fires and explosion onboard.
 The consequences of a fire onboard can be catastrophic, and all those who have worked on board a vessel are aware of the difficulties involved with managing a fire and the crucial importance of fire prevention. The guide focuses on self-heating, explaining the principles of self-heating, and investigating several types of cargo fires and explosions including those in bulk cargoes, containers and tankers.
 
 
This graph identifies those vessel types which have suffered most cargo fires. The relatively low tanker figures are a testament to the tight regulation and safety culture that exists in this industry. The ro-ro figure is however surprisingly high, and can be explained by the non-homogeneous nature of the cargo these vessels carry. The operator has to rely on a number of shippers correctly declaring the nature and risk of the cargo in the manifest, and is unable to easily check the condition of the goods. Old batteries, unstable equipment, leaks – none of these will necessarily be made obvious. 

Causes of self-heating

·         Availability of oxygen: For example, with many bulk coal cargoes the holds need to be kept closed and sealed. This restricts the access of air (oxygen) to the cargo which restricts the oxidation reactions, so that temperatures do not rise to problematic levels.

·         Availability of water: For example, DRI needs to be kept dry so that it cannot react with water. If water does enter holds containing DRI it can start a self-heating reaction which can then worsen, leading to oxidation reactions with air and then severe heating.

·         Reactivity of cargo: Some cargoes need to be ‘aged’ by exposure to air/oxygen so that the most easily oxidised parts have reacted before loading. This means that the rate of oxidation of the cargo is reduced and so self-heating is less likely.

·         Ability of air/oxygen to diffuse into the cargo: Self-heating due to oxidation can only progress to a problematic level if enough oxygen can pass into the cargo to produce heat that cannot be dissipated. For example, some cargoes, such as activated carbon, may need to be carried in hermetically sealed bags to stop air/oxygen contacting the cargo.

·         Temperature of cargo : Reactions are faster at higher temperatures, so the loading temperature of some cargoes needs to be restricted so that oxidation rates are not too fast. For example, bulk coal needs to be at a maximum temperature of 55°C when loading.

·         Size of the body of cargo : Heat is dissipated less effectively from a larger body, for example, some cargoes have package size restrictions or maximum container load restrictions.

Other causes of cargo fires and explosions 

1.     Cargo lights : Cargo lights in holds need to be properly isolated before cargo is loaded. This is best done by removing fuses or other physical links in the electrical circuits so that the lights cannot be switched on by mistake.

2.     Smoking and hot work : Smoking and hot work need to be properly controlled. Control of smoking can be difficult where stevedores are working on board. Hot work permits need to be properly considered, not just a ‘tick box’ exercise.

3.     Cars and other vehicles : Cars and other vehicles carried on board ships present some risk of fire. Risks include cargo shifting in heavy weather and used vehicles in poor condition giving rise to electrical faults.

4.     Fumigants : Fumigants can cause fire or explosion, particularly if there is an excessive amount of fumigant in one place; or if the fumigant is in contact with liquid water e.g. from sweating or condensation. In these situations the fumigant can react too quickly, evolving excessive heat or explosive gas/vapour. Fumigants must be correctly applied by qualified personnel.

Further details may be found by reading the full report at the links,
Or

The Essential Guide to Cargo Damage

A cargo may be considered as damaged when it is received by the buyer in a condition worse than it was dispatched by the seller




Global trade involves the movement of cargo in ships from point to point across continents and the vast oceans. Seaborne trade accounts for almost 90% of the global trade, and with such a volume, it is inevitable that cargo damage may occur from time to time..

There are several people who are in the business of trading, but do not know or understand the types of cargo damage, how it happens, why it happens, how it can be prevented and what needs to be done when faced with a cargo damage claim.

This guide has been written for those who are interested in understanding and learning about the types of cargo damages, the reason why it happens, the preventive measures to be followed to avoid cargo damage and how it should be handled.
The guide may be downloaded at,