Παρασκευή 11 Νοεμβρίου 2016

10 Important Points to Comply With Ballast Water Convention


The International maritime organization (IMO) in 1997 adopted the guidelines for control and management of ship’s ballast water to minimize transfer of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens from one sea area to another. Later, the Marine Environment Protection committee on February 2004 adopted the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ship’s Ballast Water and Sediments.
According to this convention all ships should carry and implement ballast water and sediments management plan, maintain ballast water record book and carry out ballasting and de ballasting operations in accordance with the convention.

 Mentioned below are ten important points for complying with the ballast water convention:

1. General Methods For Managing Ballast Water Whose Source Is Anything Other Than The Deep Ocean Are As Follows:

1) Proceed to Port state approved offshore location to carry out exchange

2) Seal tank against discharge while in port waters

3) Pump water to a shore reception facility

4) Prove by Laboratory analysis that the ballast Water in safe and acceptable

5) Treat the Ballast in-Situ using an approved treatment method.

2Important Points To Consider For Taking Ballast In Port

To the greatest extent possible, the ship should be slightly ballasted in port for departure using ballast tanks to allow for safe Navigation. The master should ensure that the ship takes on ballast water that is as clean as possible and care should be taken to minimize any sediment uptake. Taking on Ballast under the following circumstances should be avoided whenever possible:

1) In shallow water

2) In vicinity of sewage out-falls or dredging operations

3) Near, where there is a known outbreak of diseases communicable through ballast water

4) In areas with toxic phytoplankton blooms (harmful algae blooms such as Red tides)

5) At night when bottom- dwelling organisms may rise up in the water column

6) Where the incoming or outgoing tide is known to be turbid

7) Where tidal flushing is poor

3. Important Methods Of Ballast Water Exchange

Ballast water exchange operations are to be carried out in the deep water, open ocean as far as possible from the shore. The exchange should be conducted when the vessel is sailing in clean ocean water, which can be found more than 200 nautical miles from shore and in the water where the depth is 200 meters or more.

Currently three methods are exists and the sequential method is preferred.

Method 1:

Sequential method: The ballast tanks with water to be exchanged are emptied and refilled with clean ocean water in order to achieve at least a 95 percentage volumetric exchange. In this method the ballast tanks are emptied until the ballast pumps lose suction and then the tanks are further stripped by eductor systems.

Method 2

Flow-through method: A process by which replacement ballast water is pumped into a ballast, allowing the incoming water to overflow through the air vent or dedicated overflow vents. In practice, this means that at least three (3) tank volumes are to be pumped through each ballast tank to achieve 95% of efficiency of exchange.

Method 3

Dilution method: A process in which the replacement ballast water is filled through the top of ballast tank (e.g. Manhole) with simultaneous discharge from the bottom of the tank at the same rate, while maintaining a constant level in the tank during the operation.

4. Ballast Water Sampling Point 

The sampling of ballast water may be required by the local authorities such as a Quarantine officer. Normal ballast water sampling may be done through the sounding pipe. Location of the sounding pipes’ heads are to be marked and should be shown on the vessel plan.

5. Sediment Management

Routine cleaning to remove sediments from tanks which are used to carry ballast should be regularly under taken:

1) Flushing with small quantity of clean water in an empty tank and de-ballasting it again

2) Manual cleaning by making an entry in to a ballast tank or tanks. The tank entry is an hazardous operation and safety procedures should be followed before entry. Inform port authority and “Enclosed space entry permit” to be made prior entry.

6. Chain Lockers and Sea Chests 

Subjected to practical accessibility, all sources of sediment retention such as anchors, cables, chain lockers, suction wells should be cleaned out regularly as an additional precaution to further reduce the possibility of spreading contamination.

7. Disposal of Sediments

During cleaning and De-slitting operations, the tank sediments should be safely disposed of and should NOT be discharged in estuarine of coastal waters. Safe disposal consists of removal to shore facilities or designated landfill areas or discharge into deep ocean water in accordance with the convention.

8. Record Keeping

All the data of ballasting and De-ballasting operations, ballast water exchange  etc. should be recorded with time and position in the ballast water record book .When sediment is cleaned from ballast tanks or chain lockers, this data should also be logged.

9. Ballast Water Management Officer

Usually, Chief Officer is the designated person for ballast water management. He must ensure that the procedures laid out in the ballast water management plan is implemented on board properly. It is important to plan and carry out ballasting and De-ballasting operation taking in to account the stability, trim factors of the vessel and advising other officers to carry out the operation safely. Prepare the ballast water declaration from prior to arrival in port. Assist port state control or quarantine officers for any sampling that may need to be taken. Maintain the Ballast water record book properly.

10. Crew Training and Familiarization

All officers and ratings should be trained and familiarized regarding ship’s pumping plan, positions of air and sounding pipes, location of tanks and manholes, compartment and tank suctions, pipe lines as well as remote pump operation and sounding equipment. Also all crew should be made aware of safety precautions and hazards involved. In addition, officers should be familiarized with record –keeping and approved stability booklet, and ballast water log should be cross checked everyday.

More researches are still under progress to enhance ballast water management and to eradicate the transfer of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens, thus preventing change in marine environment and marine lives. Plans for making ships without ballast tanks are also underway which will further help in putting an end to pollution caused by ballast water.


California to Enforce At-Berth Regulation Next Year

California Air Resources Board (ARB) has issued an advisory to inform affected vessel fleets and terminal operators as to how Air Resources Board (ARB) staff will proceed with enforcement of the Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Auxiliary Diesel Engines Operated on Ocean-Going Vessels At-Berth in a California Port (At-Berth Regulation or Regulation), beginning January 1, 2017.


The provisions in this Advisory will cover actions beginning January 1, 2017, and ending when ARB revokes this Advisory. ARB will evaluate eligibility for the flexibility provided in this Advisory on a case-by-case basis, as set forth below. As of January 1, 2017, this Advisory supersedes previous advisories (dated December 2013 and March 2015) regarding the At-Berth Regulation. Vessel fleet and terminal compliance plans for the 2017 calendar year may follow the guidance in this Advisory


ARB’s At-Berth Regulation is intended to reduce emissions of diesel particulate matter (PM) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx) from auxiliary engines on ocean-going vessels while at-berth at California ports. Fleets affected by the Regulation include those composed of container vessels, passenger vessels, or refrigerated cargo vessels. Fleets can comply through one of two paths: the Reduced Onboard Power Generation Option (that relies on use of shore-based electrical power), or the alternative Equivalent Emissions Reduction Option.


The Regulation requires fleets complying under the Reduced Onboard Power Generation Option to satisfy the following two criteria beginning on January 1, 2017:


• Visits: At least 70 percent of a fleet’s visits to a port must satisfy the following limit on engine operation: for each visit, the auxiliary engines on the vessel cannot operate for more than three hours during the entire time the vessel is at-berth (e.g., a shore power visit); and


• Power Reductions: The fleet’s total onboard auxiliary engine power generation must be reduced by at least 70 percent from the fleet’s baseline power generation.


Fleets that comply under the Equivalent Emission Reduction Option pathway must reduce NOx and PM by 70percent or more through use of an ARB-approved technology.


On January 1, 2020, the requirements under the existing regulation increase to 80 percent for the visit, power reduction, and equivalent emission reduction requirements.


ARB understands it may not be possible for regulated entities to satisfy certain provisions in the Regulation under certain circumstances. As a result, ARB will offer six possible scenarios (see relevant advisory below), which may apply on a case-bycase basis, with the objective of providing flexibility to fleets that have equipped their vessels to use shore power or contracted to use an alternative control technology to comply with the At-Berth Regulation.


View the six different scenarios that California ARB offers by reading current advisory
http://www.green4sea.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/CARB-Advisory-on-At-Berth-Regulation-2016_11.pdf

Τετάρτη 2 Νοεμβρίου 2016

AMENDMENTS TO MARPOL ANNEX I - Regs 1, 12, 13, 17 and 38 of MARPOL Annex I, Supplement to the IOPP Certificate and Oil Record Book Parts I and II

AMENDMENTS TO REGULATIONS 1, 12, 13, 17 AND 38 OF MARPOL ANNEX I

Circular may be downloaded at,

http://www.imo.org/blast/blastDataHelper.asp?data_id=26472&filename=187(59).pdf

LR Summary Report IMO Marine Environment and Protection Committee (MEPC 70)





The LR Summary Report for the the IMO Marine Environment and Protection Committee (MEPC 70) is now available.

The meeting was held on 24-28 October 2016, at the IMO headquarters in London. This briefing
summarizes subjects under discussion which are relevant to the work of Lloyd's Register.

The full MEPC may be downloaded at,

http://www.lr.org/en/_images/229-103461_MEPC_70_Summary_Report.pdf?utm_source=pardot&utm_medium=email&utm_term=lrmarine&utm_content=publication&utm_campaign=MEPC70SummaryReport


UK P+I CLUB 10/2016 - Loading Grain Cargoes in the Pacific Northwest - USA

The UK P&I Club offers the following advice to ship owners and charterers who load grains at ports in Washington and Oregon.

The Bulletin may be downloaded at,

http://www.ukpandi.com/fileadmin/uploads/uk-pi/LP%20Documents/LP_Bulletins/Bulletin_1118_-_Loading_Grain_Cargoes_in_the_Pacific_Northwest_-_USA.pdf

Δευτέρα 31 Οκτωβρίου 2016

EMSA Issues Equasis Annual Report 2015


EMSA issued Equasis Annual Report 2015 providing a picture of the worlds’ merchant fleet in 2015, derived from data contained in the Equasis database. It examines the structure and characteristics of the fleet and its performance.

Merchant Fleet Population Overview

The Equasis fleet is dominated (81%) by small and medium sized ships up to 24.999 GT. Small ships alone represent 37% by number, although around only 1% by tonnage.Tugs (19.9%), general cargo ships (18.7%), oil and chemical tankers (14.6%) and bulk carriers (12.9%) are the most
common ship types by number, representing about two thirds of the Equasis fleet. Most of these are small and medium sized ships.

Within the large and very large categories, bulk carriers (40.3%), oil and chemical tankers (24.5%) and container ships (17.2%) represent about 85% of the fleet in number in these ship size categories.

In terms of tonnage, the large and very large size categories represent 81% of the Equasis fleet (Graph 2), with oil and chemical tankers, bulk carriers, and container ships jointly dominating both categories at 84% (large) and 83.6% (very large).

The most modern fleets are made up of the biggest ships in tonnage. Looking back at the statistics of the previous years, it is clear that the younger ships are bigger than their predecessors. This trend has been observed in previous years with the biggest ships being recent additions to the fleet.



Around a third (35%) of the total number of ships are associated with a targeted flag State; this proportion is approximate for each size category: 36% for the medium sized ship category, 32% for the large category and the very large.

For the targeted flag States, general cargo ships are the most common ship category in number (21.7%), but bulk carriers are the most common ship type category by tonnage (44%). This is expected considering that these two ship types are the most common with respect to the total number of ships and tonnage (19.9% and 35.1%, respectively).

In comparison, oil and chemical tankers (20.4%), bulk carriers (18.1%), and general cargo ships (17.9%), have a larger proportion of the total number of ships originating from non-targeted flag States.

The report states the majority of maritime traffic occurs in the Mediterranean Sea (12%) and Asia (39%), with both geographical areas accounting for 51% of the total sightings reported to Equasis. In respect to ship size, small sized ships were predominately sighted in the Mediterranean Sea (39.9%) while very large ships in Asia (41.1%). (see below table & graph)




Further details may be found by reading EMSA report here below,

Transfers By Personnel Basket


The transfer of personnel between vessels and installations using personnel baskets has been common practice in the offshore oil and gas industry for many years and the hazards are well known. However, seafarers on cargo vessels are less likely to participate in such transfers and may not be familiar with this activity or the potential hazards. With an increasing number of tankers being requested to conduct personnel transfers by basket during Ship to Ship (STS) operations and at offshore terminals, it is important that seafarers recognize the risks involved.
This Bulletin is intended to provide seafarers with an understanding of personnel basket transfers and the precautionary measures that should be taken to reduce the risk of incidents. The details may also be used as an aide memoire by seafarers working on vessels in the offshore industry and as a reference tool by companies when drafting appropriate procedures for the Safety Management System (SMS). In addition, flag states, local authorities, the industry sector, industry associations and charterers may have specific requirements regarding personnel basket transfers which should also be taken into account. Vessels that may conduct personnel transfers by basket should be guided by suitable SMS procedures covering all aspects of the operation.