These disputes started around March/April with bunkers stemmed in Houston
and gradually spreading to different regions and countries.
It is also thought that there may be issues regarding fuel quality,
due to blending in order to provide IMO 2020 Sulfur Cap compliant fuel.
However, the purpose of this article is to bring into focus the
need for a proper fuel testing and analysis regime to be in place.
Testing fuel samples on board is possible but there are
limitations as to these findings, which generally are limited to density,
viscosity, pour point, water content and compatibility. Whilst on board testing
is useful to get early indications of problems, it is not sufficient to test for
some of the issues seen recently, for example the presence of contaminants,
such as phenolic compounds. However, Skuld understands that
owners routinely send bunker samples for laboratory testing for
the presence of these compounds.
Correct sampling and which of the samples are to be tested and analyzed
are just as important as the analysis itself. In most cases, the relevant contract
between the parties specifies which samples are to be used for analysis (and be
binding) and how those samples are to be collected.
For example, the BIMCO Bunker Terms 2018 stipulate at Clause 4 (a)
that: -
“.... a primary sample shall be drawn at a point, to be mutually
agreed between the Sellers and the Buyers.... closest to the Vessel’s bunker
manifold and otherwise in accordance with the procedures set out in IMO
Resolution MEPC.182(59) Guidelines for the Sampling of Fuel Oil for
Determination of Compliance with
MARPOL 73/78 Annex VI or any subsequent amendments thereto...”
In terms of quality claims, at Clause 9(b)(ii): -
“In the event that a claim is raised.... the Parties hereto shall
have the quality of the Marine Fuel analyzed by a mutually agreed, qualified
and independent laboratory”
For time charters, the BIMCO Bunker Quality Control Clause for
Time Chartering provides that: -
“(3)... during bunkering representative samples of the fuel(s)
supplied shall be taken at the Vessel’s bunkering manifold and sealed in the
presence of competent representatives of the Charterers and the
Vessel...(4)...and any dispute as to whether the bunker fuels conform to the
agreed specification (s) shall be settled by analysis of the sample(s)....whose
findings shall be conclusive evidence as to the conformity or otherwise with
the bunker fuel specification(s)”
The MEPC.182 (59) ‘Guidelines for the Sampling of Fuel Oils’ are
benchmark guidelines to ensure the integrity of the sampling process and sets
out details, such as sample location, handling and storage. In relation to the
sampling method used to take samples from the manifold, as set out in the above
clauses, the guideline recommends that the sample should “...be drawn continuously
throughout the bunker delivery period”.
Various methods of tank sampling are possible, but some are more
representative than others. Thus it is important to include on the sample
bottle a label detailing the method used.
It is also important to seal and label the bottles correctly and
to ensure that a sufficient sample volume is collected. It is usually
recommended that five samples are collected; the MARPOL sample, supplier’s
sample, vessel’s own retained sample, on board analysis sample and a sample for
independent analysis.
Testing
A suitable testing laboratory should be agreed upon in advance and
set out in the contract. If this has not been done then the parties should agree
on a laboratory to test the agreed, binding, sample. Such a laboratory should
be qualified, independent and accredited and capable of undertaking the
specific tests and analysis required.
It should also be noted that not all laboratories allow the
testing to be witnessed and the parties will need to make clear if this is
acceptable. It should also be noted that where there are samples to be tested
under both a charterparty and a bunker supply contract then the same laboratory
should be used for both samples in order to ensure the same methodology and
processes are applied.
There should also be a testing protocol as agreed between the
parties’ experts as this will avoid any later arguments as to the method used.
The results of the analysis will then be measured against the fuel
specifications as stipulated under the relevant charter party or bunker supply
contract, i.e. typically ISO 8217 (and whichever version is agreed e.g. 2012, or
2017). The results will show whether the fuel was on specification under the
ISO 8217
‘Table 2’ requirements, which set out limits for, amongst other
things, sulfur, water and aluminium. Further gas chromatography testing, combined
with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) will provide analysis of the fuel for the
purposes of the remainder of Clause 5, such as indicating whether the fuel is “free of any material that renders a fuel
unacceptable for use in marine applications”.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου