Currently all modern commercial ships run on fossil fuels such
as MGO (Marine gas oil), MDO (Marine diesel oil), IFO
(Intermediate fuel oil) , MFO (Marine fuel oil), HFO (Heavy fuel
oil) collectively known as bunker fuel.
These fuels have a high content of sulphur which is quite harmful to the environment.
These fuels have a high content of sulphur which is quite harmful to the environment.
The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has
been working to reduce harmful impacts of shipping on the
environment since the 1960s.
The regulations for the Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships (Annex VI) seek to control airborne emissions from ships (sulphur oxides (SOx), nitrogen oxides (NOx), ozone depleting substances (ODS), volatile organic compounds (VOC) and shipboard incineration) and their contribution to local and global air pollution, human health issues and environmental problems.
In April 2018, more than 100 Member States met at the United Nations IMO in London and adopted an initial strategy on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from ships by at least 50% by 2050 compared to 2008 levels. The current global limit for sulphur content of ships’ fuel oil is 3.50% m/m (mass by mass).
The global container shipping industry could spend up to USD 15 billion in trying to be compliant with above requirements.
The regulations for the Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships (Annex VI) seek to control airborne emissions from ships (sulphur oxides (SOx), nitrogen oxides (NOx), ozone depleting substances (ODS), volatile organic compounds (VOC) and shipboard incineration) and their contribution to local and global air pollution, human health issues and environmental problems.
In April 2018, more than 100 Member States met at the United Nations IMO in London and adopted an initial strategy on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from ships by at least 50% by 2050 compared to 2008 levels. The current global limit for sulphur content of ships’ fuel oil is 3.50% m/m (mass by mass).
The regulations to reduce sulphur oxide emissions has introduced a
new global limit for sulphur content of ships and as from 1st of January 2020 the new
global limit on the sulphur content will be 0.50% m/m.
IMO
has advised several methods through which ships can meet lower sulphur emission
standards.
Ships can meet the requirement by using low-sulphur compliant fuel oil. An increasing number of ships are also using gas as a fuel as when ignited it leads to negligible sulphur oxide emissions. This has been recognized in the development by IMO of the International Code for Ships using Gases and other Low Flashpoint Fuels (the IGF Code), which was adopted in 2015. Another alternative fuel is methanol which is being used on some short sea services. Ships may also meet the SOx emission requirements by using approved equivalent methods, such as exhaust gas cleaning systems or “scrubbers”, which “clean” the emissions before they are released into the atmosphere. In this case, the equivalent arrangement must be approved by the ship’s Administration (the flag State).
Naturally
such compliance requirements brings along with it additional costs and
uncertainty in terms of fuel costs for shipping and shipping lines. According
to industry estimates, more than 90% of the global vessel fleet will be relying
on compliant fuels when the sulphur rules step into force on 1 January 2020 and
lines will need to invest in scrubbers etc. Ships can meet the requirement by using low-sulphur compliant fuel oil. An increasing number of ships are also using gas as a fuel as when ignited it leads to negligible sulphur oxide emissions. This has been recognized in the development by IMO of the International Code for Ships using Gases and other Low Flashpoint Fuels (the IGF Code), which was adopted in 2015. Another alternative fuel is methanol which is being used on some short sea services. Ships may also meet the SOx emission requirements by using approved equivalent methods, such as exhaust gas cleaning systems or “scrubbers”, which “clean” the emissions before they are released into the atmosphere. In this case, the equivalent arrangement must be approved by the ship’s Administration (the flag State).
Many
of the shipping lines have announced that the costs for compliance will
have to be passed on to customers/trade through the implementation of new or
adjustment to existing fuel surcharges, which may vary based on the trade
lanes.
MSC estimates that the cost of the various changes that will need to be made to their fleet and its fuel supply is in excess of two billion dollars (USD) per year and that they have already started incurring these costs to be ready for 2020.
Maersk
Line expects its extra fuel and compliance costs to exceed USD 2 billion based
on expected differences in price between the current 3.5% bunker fuel and the
compliant 0.5%.MSC estimates that the cost of the various changes that will need to be made to their fleet and its fuel supply is in excess of two billion dollars (USD) per year and that they have already started incurring these costs to be ready for 2020.
The global container shipping industry could spend up to USD 15 billion in trying to be compliant with above requirements.
Now other lines like MSC, CMA-CGM, ONE, OOCL and APL have
jumped on the bandwagon, announcing that these costs for compliance will have
to be passed on to customers/trade through the implementation of new or
adjustment to existing fuel surcharges, which may vary based on the trade
lanes.
While BAF surcharge is designed to recover increases in bunker related
costs the compliance costs have not been catered for by any of the shipping
lines.
Low Sulphur
Surcharge is a surcharge levied by the lines to cover the costs associated with
using low sulphur fuel in line with the IMO 2020 Sulphur Cap regulation.
Although this the term used, different shipping lines are already
calling it different names – Low Sulphur Surcharge (LSS),
Green Fuel Surcharge (GFS), Emission
Control Area Surcharge (ECA), Low
Sulphur Fuel Surcharge (LSF) with
different quantum.
All
lines are said to be preparing to levy this as a mandatory surcharge in
addition to freight and other surcharges come 2019 on all trade lanes
especially the ECA zones.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου